The problem with conventional audio interfaces and plugins is the issues with audio latency during the recording stage. In layman’s terms, that means you can run your UAD plugins in zero-latency without using your computer’s CPU.įor you guitar/bass players out there, that’s some terrific news! My personal favourite feature of Universal Audio plugins is the ability to host them using your audio interface’s onboard-DSP acceleration. Universal Audio plugins are better because of their integration with onboard-DSP acceleration The original manufacturers have approved of every plugin prior to its release, so that’s some pretty serious accountability.
Universal Audio “borrows” the schematics from them and replicates the device circuit by circuit until it sounds EXACTLY like the original.
Well, if you were Universal Audio, you would partner up with the manufacturer. If I wanted to recreate the sound of the Teletronix LA-2A, how would I go about doing that? We’re not comparing Universal Audio to other high-quality plugin manufacturers YET, but we are making the distinction between lower-quality plugins (like the ones you can get for free). Instead of simply creating a “snapshot” of the actual sound, Universal Audio and other reputable plugin manufacturers recreate the analog circuitry in the digital world. It’s even more important when the plugins were designed to emulate an ACTUAL piece of hardware. The main difference between high-quality analog modelled plugins is the amount of work that goes into making them. The first thing we need to understand is the difference between digital modelling and analog modelling (or physical modelling). Universal Audio plugins are better because of their analog modelling (physical modelling) technology
0 kommentar(er)
